Wednesday, December 3, 2025
Home Blog

Honduras Election Hangs in the Balance as U.S. Influence Faces Setback

With a little over two-thirds of the ballots in the Honduras election tallied, the lead has changed hands.

The former vice-president, Salvador Nasralla, has a small but potentially significant lead over his rival, the conservative former mayor of Tegucigalpa, Nasry Asfura. Yet Asfura’s National Party continues to brief journalists that they have the numbers for an eventual win.

In Washington, President Donald Trump has staked his hopes on nothing less than an outright Asfura victory and has tried to directly influence the race in support of his favoured candidate.

Whether it has been intimating that funds could be withheld from the impoverished Central American nation or making unsubstantiated allegations of electoral fraud, many in Honduras see the US president’s fingerprints all over this election.

To Honduran political analyst, Josué Murillo, it smacks of the kind of treatment Honduras expected from Washington during the Cold War.

“No government should come here and treat us as a banana republic. That is a lack of respect,” he says in a coffee shop in Tegucigalpa.

“Donald Trump saying who we should elect violates our autonomy as a nation, and it affects our elections as well.”

Irrespective of whether the National Party go on to victory, one of their key figures is already celebrating.

On Monday, ex-President Juan Orlando Hernández walked out of jail in Virginia a free man having served just one year of a 45-year sentence for drug-smuggling and weapons charges.

His release came after Trump urged Honduran voters to cast their ballots for Asfura.

Hernández was unexpectedly pardoned by Trump, despite having been found guilty last year by a court in New York of running a drug conspiracy which had brought more than 400 tonnes of cocaine into the United States.

His time in office had also been marred by allegations of serious human rights violations by the police and security forces, particularly against government critics.

So, when Hernández was arrested in 2022, then extradited to the United States and eventually jailed, most Hondurans celebrated it as a rare moment of justice in a nation riddled with institutional impunity, especially for the political elites.

Trump has claimed the opposite, telling journalists on Air Force One that “the people of Honduras really thought (Juan Orlando Hernández) was set up and it was a terrible thing”.

Reuters Honduras former President Juan Orlando Hernández is escorted by authorities as he walks towards a plane of the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for his extradition to the United StatesReuters
Ex-President Juan Orlando Hernández was extradited to the United States in 2022

Journalists in Honduras who have covered the rise and fall of Hernández – from the moment he rose to national prominence following a coup in 2009 to his extradition – struggle to recognise that description of a roundly detested former president.

However, he does still have his supporters, particularly in the National Party. And none have been more vocal in maintaining his innocence or calling for his pardon than his wife, Ana García Carías.

I sat down with the former First Lady, who described Hernández’s release as “like being in a dream, a dream made reality”.

“We spoke to him this morning (Tuesday) and he is in a safe place. We were so happy, we got all the children onto the phone together with my mother-in-law, and shared a moment of happiness, laughter and prayer together.”

In terms of the future, the question now arises as to whether Hernández will attempt to return to Honduras. Ms García Carías says that his potential return depends less on the outcome of the election and more on whether the authorities will guarantee his safety.

“It depends on the security guarantees they give him in this country,” she says.

“Day after day, this government – which thank God is on its way out – used a discourse of hate about my husband that they spoke of persecution against him. And that’s very dangerous for an ex-president – to return to a place where they’ve cultivated hatred against him from the very top, the president, down to the lowliest functionary.”

Ms García Carías alleged her husband had been a victim of “lawfare”, of “the deep state” and of a “politically motivated witch-hunt” by the Biden administration. I put it to her that the case against her husband had largely been drawn up by the Drug Enforcement Administration and the US Department of Justice during Trump’s first term, not President Biden’s.

It was a point she quickly dismissed.

“That’s what the prosecutors claimed but I think it’s so illogical,” she argues. “In whose mind would it make sense to bring a man they say was a co-conspirator into meetings with the CIA, the DEA, to give classified information on national security?”

“There was a political campaign (against him) involving figures in the Biden administration,” she insisted, “and I think there was manipulation of the facts after the event.”

Reuters Ana García Carías, wife of the former Honduran president Juan Orlando HernándezReuters
Ana García Carías, wife of the ex-president Juan Orlando Hernández, says he was a victim of the “deep state”

Ms García Carías publicly recognised the role of two key MAGA figures in securing her husband’s pardon: the influential conservative political advisor Roger Stone – himself the beneficiary of a Trump pardon – and the former Florida Congressman, Matt Gaetz.

“They both got involved with the case,” she says. “I recognise and thank them for their contribution. In fact, I spoke to Mr Stone on his radio programme on Sunday and he said that he had taken a letter from Juan Orlando, which he had written on his birthday to ask for a pardon and delivered it directly to President Trump.”

Meanwhile, the vote count in Honduras carries on into another night.

As the ballots continue to be tallied, it should soon become clear whether Trump will get his way in Honduras and see a new ally elected in the country just as he pardons an old one.​​

Global Tensions Rise as President Trump Opposes South Africa’s 2026 G20 Summit Bid

Washington, D.C. | Brussels | Canberra | Johannesburg — President Donald Trump has drawn sharp international criticism after reportedly attempting to block South Africa from hosting the 2026 G20 Summit. The move, which sources say stems from geopolitical friction and concerns over South Africa’s foreign policy alignments, has sparked a wave of diplomatic backlash across continents.

According to senior diplomatic officials, Trump has been lobbying key G20 member states to reconsider South Africa’s eligibility, citing its recent engagements with Russia and China as cause for concern. The effort is seen by many as a challenge to the G20’s founding principles of inclusivity and multilateral cooperation.

South African leaders have condemned the maneuver as “unwarranted interference,” emphasizing the country’s pivotal role in representing the Global South. “This is not just about South Africa,” said a government spokesperson. “It’s about ensuring that the G20 remains a platform for all voices, not just the most powerful.”

European Union diplomats and Australian foreign policy experts have echoed these concerns. “The G20 must reflect global diversity and shared leadership,” said one EU official. “Undermining a host country based on political disagreements risks fracturing the very foundation of international dialogue.”

The 2026 summit, if held in South Africa, would mark a historic moment for the African continent, offering a platform to spotlight global inequality, climate resilience, and digital transformation. Analysts warn that politicizing the hosting process could erode trust in the G20 and deepen divisions at a time when global cooperation is urgently needed.

As the debate intensifies, world leaders face a critical choice: uphold the G20’s inclusive ethos or risk turning it into a geopolitical battleground.

Guinea-Bissau Military Coup 2025: What Happened, Why It Matters, and What Comes Next

In a dramatic turn of events, Guinea-Bissau has become the latest African nation to fall under military control. The November 2025 coup has sent shockwaves across West Africa, raising urgent questions about democracy, regional stability, and the future of civilian rule.

On November 27, 2025, just days after national elections, Guinea-Bissau’s military seized power, ousting President Umaro Sissoco Embaló. The coup unfolded swiftly:

Military forces stormed key government buildings, detaining senior officials and taking control of the capital, Bissau. President Embaló was reportedly detained and later fled to Senegal aboard a military aircraft. General Horta N’Tam, a high-ranking officer, declared himself head of a transitional government, citing “national security concerns” and “electoral irregularities.”

The coup occurred before the official results of the November elections were released, fueling speculation about the military’s motives and the legitimacy of the electoral process.

Guinea-Bissau’s coup is not an isolated incident—it’s part of a wider pattern of democratic backsliding in West Africa. Since 2020, countries like Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, and now Guinea-Bissau have experienced military takeovers.

Key implications include, Regional Instability: The coup threatens to destabilize the fragile balance in the Gulf of Guinea, a region already grappling with insurgencies and economic hardship. Democratic Erosion: The military’s actions undermine electoral processes and embolden similar interventions elsewhere. Geopolitical Tensions: The coup places pressure on regional blocs like ECOWAS and international partners to respond.

The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) swiftly condemned the coup, suspending Guinea-Bissau from its decision-making bodies and calling for a return to constitutional order. The United Nations, African Union, and European Union echoed these sentiments.

South Africa also issued a strong statement, denouncing the military takeover and urging the restoration of democratic governance.

Several underlying factors contributed to the military’s seizure of power: Electoral Tensions: Allegations of vote-rigging and lack of transparency in the November 2025 elections created a volatile political climate. Corruption and Governance Failures: Years of political infighting, weak institutions, and corruption eroded public trust in the civilian government. Military Discontent: Reports suggest growing dissatisfaction within the armed forces over unpaid salaries, lack of resources, and marginalization in national decision-making.

The path forward remains uncertain. General Horta N’Tam has promised a “transitional roadmap” leading to new elections, but no clear timeline has been provided. Civil society groups are demanding: Immediate release of detained officials, Restoration of constitutional order, and International oversight of future elections

Meanwhile, the risk of civil unrest and international sanctions looms large.

 

At least four dead after fire engulfs residential high-rise buildings in Hong Kong

HONG KONG, Nov 26 – At least four people have died and an unknown number are trapped after a massive fire engulfed multiple high-rise towers of a residential complex in Hong Kong’s northern Tai Po district on Wednesday, the government and Fire Services Department said.
Firefighters battled the blaze as dusk fell, with thick black smoke billowing from the 31-storey towers and orange flames lighting up the night sky.

 

The Wang Fuk Court housing complex, where the fire started, is home to 2,000 residential apartments. The Fire Services Department told Reuters it does not yet have a figure for the number of people who may still be inside.

One resident surnamed Wong, 71, broke down in tears, saying his wife was trapped inside one of the buildings.
Three people are in critical condition having suffered burns and one is in serious condition, the government said, while others including some fire services staff have also been injured.

BUILDINGS SURROUNDED BY SMOKE AND FLAMES

 

People gathered on a nearby overhead walkway, watching in dismay as smoke billowed from the buildings, some of which were clad in bamboo scaffolding, with local media reporting the units were under renovation.
Frames of scaffolding were seen tumbling to the ground as firefighters battled the blaze, while scores of fire engines and ambulances lined the road below the complex, according to witnesses.

Wang Fuk Court is one of many high-rise housing complexes in Hong Kong, which is one of the most densely populated areas in the world. Tai Po, located near the border with mainland China, is an established suburban district with a population of about 300,000.

The complex is under the government’s subsidised home ownership scheme. It has been occupied since 1983, according to property agency websites.
Hong Kong is one of the last places in the world where bamboo is still widely used for scaffolding in construction.
The government moved to start phasing out the city’s use of its bamboo scaffolding in March, citing safety. It announced that 50% of public construction works would be required to use metal frames instead.

India Whitewashed By South Africa At Home

‘Like school kids’: India coach blasted, players ‘not ready for the level’ after South Africa sweep

Spinner Simon Harmer took six wickets as South Africa thrashed India by 408 runs in the second Test on Wednesday to sweep the series and condemn the hosts to a record loss.

It was South Africa’s first series win in India in 25 years, after bowling the home team out for a dismal 140 in a mammoth chase of 549 on day five in Guwahati.

India suffered their biggest Test defeat by runs and a fifth loss in seven home Tests, having been whitewashed 3-0 by New Zealand last year, with coach Gautam Gambhir under growing pressure.

Off-spinner Harmer, 36, returned figures of 6-37 as South Africa clinched a Test series in India for only the second time, the first in 2000 under Hansie Cronje.

“Winning a Test match and series in India is very special,” said left-arm quick Marco Jansen, who returned figures of 6-48 in India’s first innings after smashing a quickfire 93 with the bat.

Jansen, named player of the match, added: “Very well done to everyone for putting their hand up and making this happen.”

India lost the opening Test in Kolkata inside three days on a pitch with uneven bounce before South Africa once again beat the hosts in their own game of spin on a batting-friendly track.

Ravindra Jadeja resisted with 54 before Keshav Maharaj had him stumped and the spinner soon got the final wicket of Mohammed Siraj, with Jansen pulling off a stunning catch in the deep.

The visitors had declared their second innings on 260-5 on day four to hand India a record chase but the hosts’ batting once again failed and they never threatened to get close.

 

India's Kuldeep Yadav bowled out by South Africa's Simon Harmer on the fifth day of the second cricket test match between India and South Africa in Guwahati, India, Saturday, Nov. 22, 2025. (AP Photo/Anupam Nath)
India’s Kuldeep Yadav bowled out by South Africa’s Simon Harmer on the fifth day of the second cricket test match between India and South Africa

“Whether you’re playing at home or away cricket demands that determination and the extra effort,” said India captain Rishabh Pant.

“As a batting unit you need to capitalise on certain moments. As a team we didn’t do that.”

India rode their luck early in the day when Jansen had Sai Sudharsan caught behind but the delivery was declared a no-ball after the bowler overstepped. The batter was on four.

In the next over Kuldeep Yadav survived a reprieve on four when Aiden Markram dropped him at first slip off Harmer.

But the relief was short-lived for India as a relentless Harmer bowled Kuldeep for five for the first wicket of the day.

Three balls later the spinner dismissed Dhruv Jurel for two and soon sent back Pant for 13 as India slumped to 58-5.

 

 

The batters fell like nine pins on a pitch where South Africa posted 489 after they elected to bat.

India were bundled out for 201 to concede a first-innings lead of 288 but South Africa did not enforce the follow-on and decided to bat again.

South African all-rounder Senuran Muthusamy led the batting charge in the first innings with 109, his maiden Test century.

Cristiano Ronaldo scores stunning bicycle kick for Al-Nassr

Cristiano Ronaldo rolled back the years by scoring a stunning overhead kick in Al-Nassr’s 4-1 win over Al-Khaleej in the Saudi Pro League.

The 40-year-old rose in the middle of the penalty area to meet Nawaf Boushal’s right-wing cross in the sixth minute of stoppage time at Al-Awwal Park in Riyadh.

It was Ronaldo’s 954th career goal and was reminiscent of his bicycle kick for Real Madrid in the Champions League quarter-final against Juventus in 2018.

The Portugal captain also scored an overhead kick against Poland in the Nations League in November 2024.

 

In a thrilling Saudi Pro League clash yesterday, Ronaldo delivered a moment of pure brilliance. With the ball lofted into the box, the Portuguese icon launched into an acrobatic bicycle kick that soared past the goalkeeper, leaving fans and commentators in awe.

The goal instantly drew comparisons to his legendary 2018 bicycle kick against Juventus in the UEFA Champions League—a strike many still consider one of the greatest in football history.

Football fans across the globe took to social media to celebrate the goal, with hashtags like #Ronaldo, #BicycleKick, and #GOAT trending within minutes. Pundits praised the technique, timing, and athleticism, calling it a “masterclass in execution.”

Ronaldo’s performance is a testament to his enduring fitness and hunger for greatness. Despite nearing 40, he continues to defy expectations, leading Al Nassr’s charge in the Saudi Pro League and proving that age is just a number when it comes to elite performance.

Cristiano Ronaldo’s bicycle kick wasn’t just a goal—it was a statement. A reminder that legends don’t fade—they evolve. And when the lights are brightest, Ronaldo still delivers.

 

 

The G20 Summit 2025 in South Africa Ends Amid U.S. Boycott

The 2025 G20 Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa concluded on November 23 with a historic first: the gathering of world leaders on African soil. Yet the event was overshadowed by the absence of the United States, after President Donald Trump’s administration boycotted the two‑day talks.

A Historic Summit on African Soil
South Africa hosted the G20 for the first time, marking a milestone for the African continent. President Cyril Ramaphosa closed the summit with the traditional gavel ceremony, though no U.S. representative was present to receive the handover of the presidency. The U.S. boycott came after Trump alleged persecution of South Africa’s Afrikaner white minority, a claim that drew sharp criticism.

Unlike previous summits, leaders issued a declaration on the opening day. Despite opposition from the U.S. and Argentina, the declaration gained support from major economies including China, Russia, France, Germany, the U.K., Japan, and Canada.

The U.S., the world’s largest economy and next G20 president, refused to participate. South Africa rejected a last‑minute attempt by Washington to send a junior embassy official, calling it an insult. Trump announced that the 2026 G20 Summit will be hosted at his golf club in Doral, Florida.

Leaders praised South Africa for championing priorities of poorer nations despite the boycott. French President Emmanuel Macron acknowledged the milestone but noted the G20’s struggle to find common ground on geopolitical crises. Oxfam hailed the summit as the first in history to put inequality at the center of the global agenda.

The 2025 G20 Summit in South Africa was both symbolic and contentious. While it elevated Africa’s voice in global governance and spotlighted inequality, the U.S. boycott highlighted fractures within the bloc. As the presidency shifts to Washington, questions remain about the G20’s ability to unite on pressing global challenges.

 

 

The Ashes: Starc’s Firepower and Head’s Heroics Seal Australia’s Stunning Ashes Victory

Australia delivered a statement win in the opening Ashes Test at Perth Stadium, crushing England by eight wickets inside just two days. The emphatic performance was powered by Mitchell Starc’s devastating bowling and Travis Head’s explosive century, setting the tone for the 2025/26 Ashes series.

 

Mitchell Starc reminded the cricket, swing, and precision. His spell of 7/58 in the first innings was his career-best, and he followed it up with more wickets in the second to complete a remarkable ten-wicket haul.

Starc’s early breakthroughs dismantled England’s top order. His relentless pace ensured England never recovered from their collapse. With this performance, Starc reaffirmed his reputation as Australia’s ultimate Ashes weapon.

Travis Head’s Explosive Century
If Starc’s bowling set the stage, Travis Head’s batting stole the show. Promoted to open after Usman Khawaja’s injury, Head smashed a 69-ball century, finishing with 123 runs at a blistering strike rate.

Head’s aggressive stroke play neutralized England’s pace attack. He scored at over 7 runs per over, ensuring Australia chased down 205 with ease. His innings drew standing ovations, cementing his role as Australia’s batting enforcer.

A Historic Two-Day Finish

The match will be remembered as one of the shortest and most dramatic Ashes Tests in history. England collapsed from a commanding position, losing nine wickets in a single session.  Australia’s chase was completed at breakneck speed, thanks to Head’s fireworks. The victory gave Australia  1-0 lead in the series, piling pressure on England.

 

Why This Win Matters

This wasn’t just a victory—it was a statement. Australia showcased balance, aggression, and dominance. Starc’s bowling proved Australia’s attack can dismantle any batting lineup. Head’s batting showed Australia’s depth and adaptability, even under injury setbacks. The win boosts morale and sets the tone for the rest of the Ashes series.

 

South Africa Declares Gender-Based Violence a National Disaster Amid Nationwide Protests

✊ A Nation Rising Against Gender-Based Violence

On 21 November 2025, South Africa witnessed one of its most powerful demonstrations in recent years. Thousands of women, joined by men and allies, gathered across the country to protest against gender-based violence (GBV) and femicide. Organized by the NGO Women for Change, the protests were not just marches, they were symbolic acts of resistance. Participants dressed in black and lay down in public spaces, representing the countless lives lost to GBV.

The demonstrations were spread across major cities, ensuring national visibility:
– Pretoria – Union Buildings lawns
– Johannesburg – Constitution Hill
– Cape Town– Sea Point promenade
– Durban – City center

These iconic locations amplified the message, making it impossible for the government and global leaders to ignore.

Government Declares GBV a National Disaster

 

In a landmark move, the South African government officially classified gender-based violence and femicide as a national disaster. This declaration signals recognition of the crisis, but activists stress that it must be followed by concrete action plans, stricter laws, and accountability. Importantly, the classification does not automatically unlock emergency funding or powers, leaving many to question whether this will lead to real change.

The timing of the protests was strategic. With world leaders arriving for the G20 Summit in South Africa, activists ensured that the issue of GBV would gain international attention. The protests also built momentum toward a planned national shutdown, designed to pressure the government into delivering tangible solutions.

What Protesters Are Demanding

The movement is not just about awareness; it’s about action. Protesters and organizations are calling for:
– Stricter laws to protect women and children
– Effective enforcement of existing policies
– Government accountability for failures in addressing GBV
– Tangible solutions that go beyond symbolic gestures

South Africa has some of the highest rates of GBV in the world. Declaring it a national disaster is a step forward, but without immediate and sustained action, the crisis will continue. The protests highlight the urgency of the situation and the determination of citizens to demand change.

China steps in with $3.49 million HIV response fund as U.S. backs down

South Africa has received a $3.49 million boost from China to support HIV prevention services, stepping in as the United States scales back its engagement in the country’s HIV response

・China’s funding follows a reduction in U.S. assistance, previously contributing significantly to South Africa’s HIV budget.

・The grant will be channelled through UNAIDS, focusing on high-risk groups and improving response capabilities.

・South Africa aims to build a sustainable HIV response with technology and capacity-building supported by the Chinese initiative.

United States’ recent retreat from its long-standing support.

The grant, announced by Chinese Ambassador Wu Peng ahead of the G20 summit in Johannesburg, will be channelled through UNAIDS and directed toward prevention services for high-risk groups, including young people and people who abuse drugs.

For years, South Africa relied heavily on U.S. assistance to sustain the world’s largest HIV treatment programme. Washington previously contributed roughly 17% of Pretoria’s HIV budget, more than $400 million annually primarily through PEPFAR.

But earlier this year, the U.S. government sharply reduced foreign aid allocations, a decision which triggered concern among health officials and civil society groups, who warned that the move risked widening treatment gaps in a country where over seven million people live with HIV.

In the wake of the U.S. pullback, Pretoria has scrambled to stabilise funding, increasing domestic allocations while searching for alternative external partners.

China’s targeted support, though significantly smaller than the scale of past U.S. assistance, is being welcomed as an important show of commitment at a critical moment.

Chinese Ambassador Wu Peng, said the grant will be channeled through UNAIDS and directed toward prevention services for high-risk groups, including young people and people who inject drugs.

According to Ambassador Wu, the partnership is intended not only to fund prevention but to help South Africa build a more sustainable HIV response architecture through technology transfer, improved drug supply chains and capacity-building efforts.

Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi said the new funding strengthens South Africa’s ability to maintain momentum in reducing new infections and supporting vulnerable communities.

A shifting global health landscape

South Africa’s relationship with the United States is currently tense, and the country’s exclusion from Washington’s recent HIV drug rollout which included 12 high-burden African nations, has highlighted growing gaps in American support for Pretoria’s HIV response.

A new U.S.-backed initiative to expand access to HIV-prevention medication in high-burden African countries kicked off last week with the delivery of roughly 1,000 doses of Gilead Sciences’ long-acting drug, lenacapavir, to twelve African countries that have been earmarked to receive the medication as the programme scales up.

Yet despite carrying the world’s heaviest HIV burden, South Africa was excluded from the rollout, a decision that has sparked concern among health advocates given the country’s central role in the continent’s HIV response.

China, meanwhile, has intensified its diplomatic and development footprint across Africa, increasingly positioning itself as a partner willing to step in where Western commitments recede.

As Pretoria navigates this changing landscape, the country faces the dual challenge of sustaining the largest HIV programme on earth while managing the diplomatic implications of a diversifying donor mix.